Legal Opinion

Neal v. Wilson

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided March 18, 1996No. Civil H-C-95-54PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

H. FRANKLIN WATERS, Chief Judge.

This is a case in which the justice system of Arkansas, represented by the lawyers and the judiciary of this state, has not done itself proud. The long, tortured, and torturous route of this case through the courts of Arkansas, both state and federal, over many long years has ended up about where it started. In this court’s view, this has resulted from .the numerous lawyers in this case manipulating the system so as to derail it and bring this case to the stalemate that presently exists. The court also believes that the record reflects that…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. James A. Neal v. Jimmie L. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  2. Wilson v. NealSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  3. Jones v. ClintonDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1999
  4. Wilson v. NealSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  5. Taylor v. CurrieDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API