Legal Opinion

Coldwell Banker Residential Real Estate Services, Inc. v. Missouri Real Estate Commission

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 17, 1986No. 67204PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKMAR, Judge.

The plaintiff-respondent, Coldwell, is a real estate broker licensed in Missouri. It is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Sears, Roebuck & Co., (Sears), the well-known national merchandising chain.

In 1982 Coldwell developed a promotional sales program known as the “Sears Home Buyer’s Savings Program” (Savings Program). Home buyers who purchase a home through Coldwell receive, after the closing of the transaction, a booklet of coupons entitling them to discounts on certain merchandise and services available at Sears. Coldwell advertises the availability of the program through radio…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  5. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Rouner v. WiseSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
  2. United States v. Ellis B. Goodman, United States of America v. Bedford Direct Mail ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
  3. Holman v. HolmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Gordon A. Gundaker Real Estate Co. v. Missouri Real Estate CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Longview of St. Joseph, Inc. v. City of St. JosephMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API