Legal Opinion

Kentucky Bar Ass'n v. Stuart

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1978PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

Stuart and Thompson are before us charged with engaging in unprofessional and unethical conduct by the Kentucky Bar Association because they mailed letters to two real estate agencies on their law office stationery which allegedly directly and personally solicited legal business. The two letters upon which this complaint is based were mailed on June 15, 1977 and June 30, 1977. The body of the letters reads as follows:

“This is to advise you that our office handles all aspects of legal work concerning real estate transactions. Our fees are as follows:

Opinion of title: 50.00-

Deed preparation:…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. In Re PrimusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Kentucky State Bar Ass'n v. DonoghoeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1972

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. In re KofflerNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Bishop v. Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1981
  3. Matter of Discipline of AppertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  4. In re GreeneNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Robert J. Adams, Jr. v. Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Illinois, and Carl R. RolewickCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API