Legal Opinion

Connolly v. County of Orange

California Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1992No. S016686PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BAXTER, J.

We are asked to decide whether article XIII, section 3, subdivisions (a) and/or (d) of the California Constitution 1 preclude imposition of an ad valorem tax on privately held leasehold interests in real property owned by the University of California and improved with homes owned and occupied by the university employees who hold the leases. Because appellate decisions have created uncertainty as to the tax status of these interests, 2 and similar properties comprise a significant part of the tax base of several local governments and school districts, 3 we address this…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Justus v. AtchisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Cedars of Lebanon Hospital v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Yale University v. Town of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
  4. Kaiser Co. v. ReidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  5. People v. ShearerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Norgart v. Upjohn Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  2. First Bank of Turley v. Fidelity & Deposit Insurance Co. of MarylandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  3. Steinhart v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Tudor Ranches, Inc. v. State Comp. Ins. FundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. Mission Housing Development Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API