Legal Opinion

State v. Erbele

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1996No. Criminal 960102PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

This appeal is from the trial court’s order suppressing evidence seized in the search of an automobile following the Defendant’s arrest for Driving Under the Influence (DUI). The trial court suppressed the seizure of the Defendant’s ignition keys. The State argues the suppression of this evidence was improper. We reverse and remand.

On November 3, 1995, Steve Spitzer, a McIntosh County resident, contacted State Radio reporting a car had left the road approximately three quarters of a mile from his farmhouse. Responding to this call, Steve Delzer, McIntosh County…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. State v. GlaesmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. RonngrenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State v. ZimmermanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. GreggNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. HerrickNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. TognottiNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. WanzekNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. HaverlukNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API