Legal Opinion

State v. Zimmerman

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1995No. Cr. 940209PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

The State appeals an order suppressing evidence that Michael Zimmerman unlawfully possessed dead deer. The trial court ruled there was no valid consent to search the Zimmerman farmstead. We address the issue of who has common authority over premises to consent to a search, and reverse the order.

I

A North Dakota Game and Fish Department warden obtained a search warrant for a building on the Michael Zimmerman farm, on November 22, 1993. Based on a tip, the warden believed three untagged whitetail deer could be found in a steel building on the farmstead. The warrant stated the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Illinois v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. City of Fairgo v. ThompsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  4. United States v. Cesar DuranCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  5. United States v. Ronald B. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. State v. DeCoteauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. GlaesmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. HawleyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. SabinashNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API