Legal Opinion

Klusmire v. Dixon

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 9, 1939No. 34,464PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

Plaintiffs, alleging they were the owners of certain real property and that defendants were their tenants, sued to recover rents claimed to be due. Defendants answered that the deed by which they had conveyed the property to plaintiffs and the lease contract containing an option for them to repurchase the property, on which plaintiffs predicated their suit, evidenced a debt and were intended as a mortgage. A trial by the court resulted in a judgment *872for defendants, holding the instruments created the relation of mortgagor and mortgagee.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hoyt v. Union National Bank of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  2. Wooddell v. AllbrechtSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  3. Wiswell v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  4. Root v. WearSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  5. DePee v. National Life & Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Winsor v. PowellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
  2. Bradbury v. WiseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  3. Jones v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1946
  4. Sanders v. VisserSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948
  5. Wyatt v. TaylorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API