Legal Opinion

Wooddell v. Allbrecht

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 9, 1909No. 16,155PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Error from Reno district court; Peter J. Galle, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was' delivered by

Benson, J.:

This was a suit1 to compel the specific performance of‘an oral contract to convey real ¡estate. The parties agree that such a contract was made, but disagree as to the estate to be conveyed. The plaintiff, Allbrecht, alleged that he was to have the land in fee simple for $20 per acre, while the defendants, Wooddell and wife, assert that an estate for the life of the vendee ■only was sold. The plaintiff took immediate possession of the land, made lasting and valuable improvements upon it, and paid the taxes. After holding and ■cultivating…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Anderson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  2. Bichel v. OliverSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  3. Baldwin v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  4. Winston v. BurnellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890
  5. Long v. DuncanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Woltz v. First Trust Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  2. Meador v. ManloveSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  3. Shoemake v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  4. Fish v. PoormanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  5. Nash v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API