Wooddell v. Allbrecht
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Reno district court; Peter J. Galle, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was' delivered by
Benson, J.:
This was a suit1 to compel the specific performance of‘an oral contract to convey real ¡estate. The parties agree that such a contract was made, but disagree as to the estate to be conveyed. The plaintiff, Allbrecht, alleged that he was to have the land in fee simple for $20 per acre, while the defendants, Wooddell and wife, assert that an estate for the life of the vendee ■only was sold. The plaintiff took immediate possession of the land, made lasting and valuable improvements upon it, and paid the taxes. After holding and ■cultivating…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Anderson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
- Bichel v. OliverSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
- Baldwin v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
- Winston v. BurnellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890
- Long v. DuncanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Woltz v. First Trust Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1932
- Meador v. ManloveSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
- Shoemake v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
- Fish v. PoormanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
- Nash v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.