Legal Opinion

Root v. Wear

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 10, 1916No. 19,973PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Shawnee district court, division No. 1; Alston W. Dana, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

This was an action brought by Hiram C. Root to recover from the Kaw River Sand Company and others *235a small tract of land bordering on the Kansas river. On July 12, 1900, Root executed a warranty deed purporting to convey the absolute title of the tract to P. E. Wear for a consideration of $500. At the same time Wear entered into a written agreement to the effect that if Root would pay to Wear not later than October 12, 1900, the sum of $513.75, Wear would re-convey the tract to Root, and that time was of the essence of the contract. On…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. McNamara v. CulverSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
  2. Union Pacific Railroad v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  3. Fabrique v. Cherokee & Pittsburg Coal & Mining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  4. Martin v. AllenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  5. Elston v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Clinton v. Utah Construction Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Hoyt v. Union National Bank of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  3. Dickens v. HestonIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Benson v. RosebaughSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  5. Dyer v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API