Legal Opinion
Mogilevsky v. Bally Total Fitness Corp.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided March 31, 2004No. CIV.A. 01-11240-WGY, CIV.A. 01-11749-WGYPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
YOUNG, Chief Judge.
In these two cases, the plaintiff, Boris Mogilevsky (“Mogilevsky”), sued the defendant, Bally Total Fitness Corporation (“Bally”), for damages arising from Bally’s conduct in relation to his employment. In the first suit (the “FLSA Action”), Mogi-levsky asserted claims related to the nonpayment of wages under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219, the comparable state statute, Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 151, §§ 1-22, and Mass Gen. Laws ch. 149, § 184.2d Am. Compl. ¶ 1 [Doc. No. 21 in Civ. Action No. 01-11240], In the second suit (the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brooklyn Savings Bank v. O'NeilSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Marek v. ChesnySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Finley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Autozone, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013
- Radford Trust v. First Unum Life Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- Souryavong v. Lackawanna CountyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- Marrotta v. Suffolk CountyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010
- McDonough v. City of QuincyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.