Legal Opinion

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Autozone, Inc.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided March 29, 2013No. Civil Action No. 10-11648-WGYPublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WILLIAM G. YOUNG, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This pending motion for attorneys’ fees of intervenor plaintiff Frank Mahoney Burroughs (“Mahoney Burroughs”) follows a settlement and consent decree between the plaintiff Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (the “Commission”), Mahoney Burroughs, and the defendants AutoZone, Inc. and AutoZoners, LLC (collectively, “AutoZone”).

II. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The Commission commenced the underlying civil rights action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”) on behalf of Mahoney Burroughs against…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. New York Gaslight Club, Inc. v. CareySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Grendel's Den, Inc. v. John P. Larkin, Cambridge License Commission, Grendel's Den, Inc. v. John P. LarkinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Norkunas v. HPT Cambridge, LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013
  2. Hermida v. ArchstoneDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013
  3. Sinclair v. BerryhillDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
  4. In re Volkswagen & Audi Warranty Extension LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
  5. Tyler v. Michaels Stores, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API