Legal Opinion
McDonough v. City of Quincy
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided January 26, 2005No. CIV.A.01-11860 WGYPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
YOUNG, Chief Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This application for attorney’s fees follows a trial between Plaintiff John McDon-ough (“McDonough”) and the City of Quincy (“City”). Filed under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq., as amended (“Title VII”), and chapter 151B of Massachusetts General Laws, McDonough sought to recover damages for acts of retaliation allegedly taken against him by the City of Quincy. PL’s Compl. [Docket No. 1]. After a jury trial, a verdict was returned in favor of McDonough awarding $300,000 in damages. Jury Ver. [Docket No. 91], Thereafter, McDonough…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Norkunas v. HPT Cambridge, LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Autozone, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013
- Dixon v. International Brotherhood of Police OfficersDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006
- Walsh v. Boston UniversityDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009
- Stokes v. Saga International Holidays, Ltd.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.