Legal Opinion

In re Coker

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided August 17, 1972No. 8674PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Baldwin, Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals, adhered to on reconsideration, sustaining the rejection of claims 1-3 of appellants’ application1 under 35 USC 102(a). Appeal of the board’s decision as to two other claims has been abandoned by appellants.

The Invention

The claims are drawn to (1-aziridinyl) alkyl esters of polycar-boxylic acids, which appellants disclose as being useful as inhibitors which retard the reaction of aluminum with various degreasing solvents, and as curing agents for acid terminated polymers. Appellants’ compounds are prepared…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Application of Eric D. BrownCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
  2. Application of William A. SheppardCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
  3. Application of Herman HoeksemaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
  4. Application of Gene R. WilderCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
  5. Application of Herman HoeksemaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Lonnie T. Spada and Joseph J. WilczynskiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  2. In re SamourCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
  3. In re OuttrupCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API