Legal Opinion
In Re Lonnie T. Spada and Joseph J. Wilczynski
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided August 10, 1990No. 90-1109PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.
The decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (the PTO) Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (the Board), rejecting claims 2 through 25 and 27 through 31, all the claims at issue of Spada and Wilczynski (hereinafter Spada) patent application Serial No. 859,057, filed May 2, 1986 and entitled “Pressure Sensitive Adhesives and Manufactured Articles”, is affirmed.
The Invention
The Spada invention is a pressure sensitive adhesive composition comprising a water-based latex containing a normally tacky copolymer made from specified classes and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company v. Phillips Petroleum Company, Phillips 66 Company, and Phillips Driscopipe, Inc., Defendants-Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Titanium Metals Corporation of America v. Donald W. Banner, Commissioner of Patents and TrademarksCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Application of Viktor PapeschCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
- Richardson v. Suzuki Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- In Re Frank N. Piasecki and Donald N. MeyersCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- In Re David C. PaulsenCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Atd Corporation v. Lydall, Inc., Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Crown Operations International, Ltd. And Marshall H. Krone v. Solutia Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Stanton J. Rowe v. Michael Dror and Paul TresconyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- In Re SchreiberCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.