Application of Herman Hoeksema
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
KIRKPATRICK, Judge.
This appeal is from a decision of the Board of Appeals affirming the examiner’s rejection of claim 1 in appellant’s application serial No. 30,770, filed May 23, 1960, for “9-D-Psicofuranosylpurine and 6-Substituted Derivatives.” Claims 2 and 11-25 were allowed.
The subject matter is best illustrated by the appealed claim which reads: 1
1. An N-psieofuranoside having the formula:
wherein A is selected from the class consisting of hydrogen, the group -XR wherein R is selected from the class consisting of hydrogen, lower-alkyl, and lower-aralkyl, and X is selected from the class…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Application of Viktor PapeschCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
- Application of Eric D. BrownCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
- Application of Joseph R. Riden, Jr., and James P. FlavinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
- Application of Robert M. ColeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
3Cited by4 opinions
- Application of Herman HoeksemaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
- In re CokerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
- Application of Herman HoeksemaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
- Application of Herman HoeksemaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968