Legal Opinion
Application of William A. Sheppard
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided December 17, 1964No. Patent Appeal 7259PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WORLEY, Chief Judge.
This appeal is fx*om the decision of the Board of Appeals which affirmed the examiner’s rejection of product claims 2 and 3 in appellant’s application 1 for “Arylsulfur Pentafluorides and their Preparation.” Two process claims wex*e allowed.
The nature of the subject matter involved is reflected in the appealed claims:
“2. Compounds of the formula
X„R(SF6)m,
wherein R is an aromatic hydrocarbon group, X has a maximum of eighteen carbons and is a member of the group consisting of halogen, hydroxyl, thiol, hydrocarbyl, halohy-drocarbyl, oxahydx-ocarbyl, thiahy-drocarbyl,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Application of Edward Burton LegriceCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
- Application of Eric D. BrownCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
- E. I. Dupont De Nemours and Company v. David L. Ladd, Commissioner of Patents, and Luther H. Hodges, Secretary of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
- Application of Josef Fried and Josef E. HerzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
- Application of Frank Peter Doyle, John Herbert Charles Nayler and George Newbolt RolinsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Helifix Limited v. Blok-Lok, Ltd. And William Scott Burns v. Helifix North America Corporation, Third Party CounterclaimCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- In Re John A. DonohueCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Application of Lyle B. BorstCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
- Application of Richard E. Warner and Virginia Ann WarnerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
- In re WigginsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.