Legal Opinion

Application of Gene R. Wilder

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided August 13, 1970No. Patent Appeal 8194PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BALDWIN, Judge.

Wilder has appealed from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals which sustained the rejection of claims 2, 6, 7, 9, 11, 12 and 14 in his application 1 as unpatentable under 35 U. S.C. § 102 and 35 U.S.C. § 103 over a patent to Stahly. 2 In his brief, appellant has moved to dismiss the appeal as to claims 11, 12 and 14. That motion is hereby granted, thus leaving claims 2, 6, 7 and 9 for our consideration.

THE INVENTION

We note, as did the board, that “the nature of the asserted invention is evident from the reproduced claims.” Claims 2 and 7 are representative of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Application of Edward Burton LegriceCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
  2. Application of Eric D. BrownCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
  3. In Re ThuauCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1943
  4. Application of Paul E. HochCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
  5. Application of Thomas L. Jacobs and Ronald S. BauerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Titanium Metals Corporation of America v. Donald W. Banner, Commissioner of Patents and TrademarksCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  2. In re MayCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
  3. In re AngstadtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
  4. In re SamourCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
  5. In Re John M. CorkillCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API