In Re Disciplinary Action Against Moore
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Per curiam
This matter comes to us on the petition of the director of the Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board for disciplinary action against respondent, Thomas E. Moore, a sole practitioner admitted to the Minnesota bar in 1952. Respondent failed to serve and file timely answers to the petition. The allegations of the petition are, therefore, deemed admitted. Rule 13(c), Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR). A hearing was set before this court, for the purpose of considering the imposition of appropriate discipline. We now conclude that respondent should be suspended indefinitely…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re the Disciplinary Action Against JensenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Matter of Discipline of PeckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against SchaeferSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Matter of Discipline of GorgosSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Matter of Discipline of MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against IsaacsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against KlemekSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989