Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Matter of Discipline of Moore

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 23, 1986No. C2-86-272PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

This matter comes to us on the petition of the Director of the Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board to discipline respondent attorney for client neglect and failure to cooperate with the Board. We adopt the Director’s recommendation for suspension.

Respondent Howard J. Moore was admitted to practice law in Minnesota in 1958. In May 1979, he entered into a stipulation with the Board admitting neglect in the handling of eight probate court matters. He agreed to 2 years’ supervision by another attorney, the installation of new office procedures, and reimbursement of any client losses. In…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re the Discipline of CartwrightSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Matter of Discipline of PeckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  3. Matter of Discipline of RockneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  4. Matter of Discipline of GorgosSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Disciplinary Action Against MadsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against RoselliniWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  3. In Re Disciplinary Action Against HartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  4. In RE DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST McGRATHSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  5. In Re Disciplinary Action Against MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API