Legal Opinion

In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Klemek

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 13, 1989No. C2-89-1081PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This matter comes to us on the petition of the Director of the Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board for disciplinary action against respondent Nancy T. Klemek, a sole practitioner admitted to the Minnesota bar in 1977. Respondent failed to serve and file answers to the petition and, thus, the allegations in the petition are deemed admitted. Rule 13(b),' Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR). A hearing was set before this court for the purpose of considering the imposition of appropriate discipline. We now conclude that respondent should be suspended indefinitely for a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re the Discipline of CartwrightSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. In Re the Disciplinary Action Against JensenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  3. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against SchaeferSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  4. In Re Disciplinary Action Against MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against SelmerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  2. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against ShaughnessySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  3. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against HoedemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API