Legal Opinion

McMillan v. Department of the Interior

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided November 7, 1995No. CV-S-95-143-PMP (RLH)PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PRO, District Judge.

Plaintiff Patrick McMillan (“McMillan”) filed his Complaint for Damages and Injunc-tive Relief (# 1) on February 10, 1995. In that Complaint, he alleged eleven causes of action: (1) Harassment; (2) Color of Law; (3) Double Jeopardy; (4) Fraud; (5) Bad Faith; (6) Malicious prosecution; (7) Injunc-tive Relief; (8) Punitive damages; (9) Breach of Fiduciary Duty; (10) Negligence; and (11) Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing. McMillan seeks compensatory damages of $2.8 million as well as punitive damages and injunctive relief.

Before the Court is the Defendants’ Motion…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Graziose v. American Home Products Corp.District Court, D. Nevada · 2001
  2. Donahue v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002
  3. Buckheit v. DennisDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2010
  4. Quality Mechanical Contractors, Inc. v. Moreland Corp.District Court, D. Nevada · 1998
  5. Villegas v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2013

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API