Legal Opinion
Avinash Yadav v. L-3 Communications Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 13, 2012No. 10-3249UnpublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COLE, Circuit Judge.
Petitioner Avinash Yadav filed a complaint with the U.S. Department of Labor alleging that he was terminated by Respondent L-3 Communications Corporation, Inc. (“L3”) in retaliation for bringing to the company’s attention the suspected noncompliance of a development project with regulations set by the Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”), in violation of the “whistleblower” provision of the Wendell H. Ford Aviation Investment and Reform Act for the 21st Century, 49 U.S.C. § 42121 (“AIR 21”). An administrative law judge dismissed the complaint, finding that L-3…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Turnbull Cone Baking Company of Tennessee v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- W.F. Bolin Company v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- National Labor Relations Board v. Dole Fresh Vegetables, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Hoffman v. SolisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
3Cited by4 opinions
- Consolidated Rail Corp. v. U.S. Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Weatherford U.S., L.P. v. U.S. Dep't of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023
- Bombardier, Inc. v. United States Department of LaborDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Ma v. American Electric Power, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2015