Legal Opinion

Consolidated Rail Corp. v. U.S. Department of Labor

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 28, 2014No. 13-3740UnpublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McKEAGUE, Circuit Judge.

This case concerns whether an employee was terminated in violation of the Federal Rail Safety Act. For the reasons that follow, we deny Consolidated Rail’s petition for review.

I

From December 1998 to February 2011, Mark Bailey worked as a train conductor for Consolidated Rail (“Conrail”). In the six months before he was terminated, Bailey filed approximately thirty-five formal written safety complaints. On February 11, 2011, Kenneth McIntyre, the Area Superintendent, instructed Robert Conley, Bailey’s Supervisor, to speak with the railroad employees about a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Staub v. Proctor HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. Araujo v. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
  3. Lockheed Martin Corp. v. Administrative Review BoardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  4. Avinash Yadav v. L-3 Communications Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  5. Indiana Michigan Power Co. v. United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Thomas Kuduk v. BNSF Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
  2. BNSF Railway Co. v. United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
  3. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. Thomas PerezCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
  4. Lockhart v. Long Island RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
  5. Scott Gammons v. Adroit Med. Sys., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2024

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API