Legal Opinion

Lamport Manufacturing Supply Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 28, 1928No. C-1209PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraham, Judge

The plaintiff is suing to recover a sum which is admittedly due it. Its claim grows out of a sale to it of surplus war property, for which it paid the full amount of its bid. A small portion of the material was delivered to it, and, thereafter, the defendant, finding that it was unable to deliver the balance, notified plaintiff that the contract was canceled and that a credit had been given it for the undelivered portion of the goods at the purchase price. Plaintiff repeatedly requested the payment of this credit, but it was refused. Thereupon it sued in this court. It was entitled at least…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stanford v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
  2. United States v. CoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Hummel v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1923
  4. Levy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1927
  5. Brody v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
  2. S. Silberstein & Son, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930
  3. Georgia Wholesale Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1936
  4. Wilco Floor Service, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
  5. Blue Ribbon Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API