Legal Opinion

Brody v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 20, 1928No. E-66PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraham, Judge

This case grows out of the sale of surplus Government property. The questions involved have been passed upon several times by this court, as well as by the Supreme Court.

The Government on September 30, 1919, sent out a circular proposal for bids for the purchase of certain lots of grain and bread bags. The bags were in bales at Port Kearny, N. J. The sale took place at Long Island City.

The proposal contained provisions similar to or identical with those in other cases decided by this court (Triad Corporation v. United States, 63 C. Cls. 151; Samuel & Sons v. United States, 61 C. Cls. 373,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lipshitz & Cohen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Mottram v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Triad Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1927
  4. Hummel v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1923
  5. M. Samuel & Sons v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lamport Manufacturing Supply Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1928
  2. S. Silberstein & Son, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API