Legal Opinion

Hummel v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided October 29, 1923No. B-61PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraham, Judge

There is no controversy about the facts of this case. The sale was made by an advertisement by the Ordnance Bureau of the War Department of about 42,000 tons of shell forgings located at eight different places. The advertisement gave the tonnage at each place. The price to be quoted was gross tons f. o. b. cars where stored, shipping instructions to accompany bids; material to be shipped within 10 days after award was made; sight draft to attach to bill of lading; certified check for 10 per cent of the tonnage desired was to accompany the bid.

The plaintiff bid upon three of these lots, as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Grand Tower Co. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Marsh v. McPhersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Roberts v. BenjaminSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. Shepherd v. HamptonSupreme Court of the United States · 1818
  5. Ralli v. RockmoreU.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Georgia · 1901

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Triad Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1927
  2. Commodities Recovery Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995
  3. M. Samuel & Sons v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1925
  4. Lamport Manufacturing Supply Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1928
  5. Srere v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API