Legal Opinion

S. Silberstein & Son, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 7, 1930No. H-80PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, Judge

This suit is brought for the recovery of $30,425.81 damages alleged to have been sustained by the plaintiff because of the failure of the United States to deliver to the plaintiff certain surplus Army property purchased by it at a regularly advertised sale of such property by the War Department.

On July 24, 1919, the War Department advertised for sale and solicited the public to submit bids on 14,615,442% yards, of grey gauze, 38% inches, 44 x 40, 8.20 yards to the pound, f. o. b. Atlanta, Georgia, and other points of storage. The bids of prospective purchasers were to be forwarded in special…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Erie Coal & Coke Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Mottram v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Triad Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1927
  4. Hummel v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1923
  5. Lamport Manufacturing Supply Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Condenser Service & Engineering Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
  2. Georgia Wholesale Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1936
  3. Wilco Floor Service, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API