Legal Opinion
Tropic-Aire, Inc. v. Jumper
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided September 25, 1928No. 1037PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN B. SANBORN, District Judge.
The court not having jurisdiction of the defendants Burd High Compression Ring Company and Liberty Foundries Company, upon motion the suit as against them was dismissed on their special appearance.
The bill alleges the infringement of letters patent No. 1,668,490, covering improvements in heating apparatus for automotive vehicles. The patent has not been adjudicated, and was granted May 1, 1928. The defendants in their answer assert its invalidity and noninfringement. Numerous affidavits have been filed on behalf of the plaintiff, and also on behalf of the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Boyce v. Stewart-Warner Speedometer Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
- Fuller v. GilmoreU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1902
- Crescent Specialty Co. v. National Fireworks Distributing Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
- Milwaukee Printing Co. v. StoverCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1923
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- W. A. Sheaffer Pen Co. v. Worth Featherweight Pen Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1930
- Western Electric Co. v. Cinema Supplies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
- Tropic-Aire, Inc. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1930
- Tropic-Aire, Inc. v. WildermuthCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- Carter-Wallace, Inc. v. Davis-Edwards Pharmacal Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.