Legal Opinion
Tropic-Aire, Inc. v. Wildermuth
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided April 10, 1933No. 337PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHASE, Circuit Judge.
The title of the plaintiff to the patent in suit is unquestioned. Claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, and 13 are all relied upon. The original patent to Caesar was applied for February 7, 1927, was issued May 1, 1928, and given the number 1,668,490. The application for reissue was filed August 23, 1928, and was granted November 13, 1928. The first six claims of the patent in suit were in the original; the remainder are new.
The patent relates to what are claimed to he new and useful improvements in apparatus for heating the interior of automotive *343vehicles. The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McClain v. OrtmayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Tropic-Aire, Inc. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
- Tropic-Aire, Inc. v. JumperDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1928
- Tropic-Aire, Inc. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1930
3Cited by3 opinions
- Warden v. City of St. LouisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
- E. A. Laboratories, Inc. v. Smith & Gregory of New York, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1936
- Tropic-Are, Inc. v. Cullen-Thompson Motor Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1938