Legal Opinion

Tropic-Aire, Inc. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided January 20, 1930No. 1445PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANBORN, District Judge.

The plaintiff claims the infringement by the defendant of claims 6 and 7 of reissue letters patent No. 17,131, O. S. Caesar, November 13, 1928 (original No. 1,668,490, May 1,1928). These claims read as follows:

“6. A heating system for motor-driven vehicles, comprising an engine cooling system including an inter-communicating jacket and radiator for a circulating cooling liquid, an air heating and distributing unit embodying a liquid receiving chamber in communication with the engine cooling system to form in conjunction with said system a circuit for circulation of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. NicholsSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Western Willite Co. v. Trinidad Asphalt Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
  3. Ford Motor Co. v. Parks & Bohne, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
  4. Sloan Filter Co. v. Portland Gold Min. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  5. Tropic-Aire, Inc. v. JumperDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1928

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United Motors Service, Inc. v. Tropic-Aire, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  2. Tropic-Aire, Inc. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
  3. Warden v. City of St. LouisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
  4. Tropic-Aire, Inc. v. WildermuthCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
  5. Carter-Wallace, Inc. v. Davis-Edwards Pharmacal Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API