Legal Opinion
In re Deana E.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 26, 2000No. AC 20376PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*199 Opinion
SPEAR, J.
The respondent father, Celso S.,1 appeals from the judgments of the trial court terminating his parental rights with respect to his three children, C, S and A.2 The respondent claims that the court improperly (1) denied his motion to bifurcate the proceedings and (2) found that the commissioner of children and families (commissioner) proved by clear and convincing evidence that the respondent had failed to achieve personal rehabilitation within the meaning of General Statutes § 17a-112 (c) (3) (B).3 We affirm the judgments of the trial court.
In a comprehensive memorandum of…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sheppard v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Giulietti v. GiuliettiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Statewide Grievance Committee v. EgbarinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- In re Deana E.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- In re Ashley S.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- State v. DrakefordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.