Legal Opinion
In re Deana E.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 26, 2000No. AC 20421PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FOTI, J.
The respondent father, Magdiel F.,1 appeals from the judgments of the trial court terminating his parental rights with respect to his three children, D, Y and M. On appeal, the respondent claims that (1) his due process rights were violated because the department of children and families (department) failed to give him adequate notice of either the neglect or the termination proceedings against him and (2) the court improperly proceeded to the dispositional phase of the termination proceeding because its finding that the respondent had abandoned his children was improper. We…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- In re Luis C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- In re Baby Girl B.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- In re Michael M.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- In re Kezia M.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- In re Ashley S.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- In re Jermaine S.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- In re Deana E.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- In re Ashley E.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- In Re Lukas K.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.