Legal Opinion
Alco Standard Corp. v. Charnas
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 8, 2000No. AC 19253PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FOTI, J.
The defendants, Robert Chamas and Joan Chamas, appeal from the judgment of strict foreclosure rendered by the trial court. On appeal, the defendants claim that the court improperly (1) concluded that the promissory note did not require notice of default for nonpayment and (2) rendered summary judgment as to liability. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts and procedural history are relevant to our resolution of this appeal. As part of a settlement of another action, the defendants executed a promissory note in favor of the plaintiff in the amount of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sturman v. SochaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Robinson v. WeitzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- SKW Real Estate Ltd. Partnership v. GallicchioConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- De Leonardis v. Subway Sandwich Shops, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1994
3Cited by13 opinions
- Smithfield Associates, LLC v. Tolland BankConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- New Haven Savings Bank v. LaPlaceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Wren v. MacPherson Interiors, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Murphy, Inc. v. RemodelingConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Town of Southington v. Commercial Union InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.