Legal Opinion
De Leonardis v. Subway Sandwich Shops, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 9, 1994No. 12736PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFreedman, J.
The plaintiff, Frank De Leonardis, appeals from the trial court’s acceptance of the report of the attorney trial referee. On appeal, De Leonardis claims that the trial court improperly accepted the referee’s report because (1) the attorney referee should not have granted the motion in limine filed by the defendants, Subway Sandwich Shops, Inc. (Subway), and Doctor’s Associates, Inc. (DAI), precluding De Leonardis from offering evidence about the relationship between Subway and DAI in support of his claim that DAI is the alter ego of Subway and is therefore responsible for Subway’s…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Angelo Tomasso, Inc. v. Armor Construction & Paving, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Bead Chain Manufacturing Co. v. Saxton Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Saphir v. NeustadtSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Seal Audio, Inc. v. Bozak, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Kakalik v. BernardoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Lawson v. Whitey's Frame ShopConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Carney v. Horion Investments Ltd.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2015
- Venture Partners, Ltd. v. Synapse Technologies, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Alco Standard Corp. v. CharnasConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Zadravecz v. ZadraveczConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.