Legal Opinion
Ross v. Peters
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 9, 1993No. 76059PublishedCited by 71 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPALA, Justice.
Two questions are presented on this appeal: (1) Do the terms of 20 O.S.1981 §§ 1501 et seq. authorize the State Board of Examiners of Official Shorthand Reporters to refuse enrollment as a certified shorthand reporter to any person who employs the stenomask method of reporting? and if so, (2) Do these statutes contravene the Oklahoma and U.S. Constitutions? We answer the first question in the affirmative and the second in the negative.
I
THE ANATOMY OF LITIGATION
Appellants Cathy Ross, Mona White, and Russ Burns [applicants or Ross, White and Burns] are court reporters who employ…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- Gladstone v. Bartlesville Independent School District No. 30Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Rogers v. QuikTrip Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
- Yocum v. Greenbriar Nursing HomeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- Arrow Tool & Gauge v. MeadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- Strelecki v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.