Bishop v. Takata Corp.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
1 KAUGER, J.;
11 2 We are asked to answer the question of whether the Oklahoma Mandatory Seat Belt Use Act, 1 [the Act] precludes the introduction of evidence of the use or nonuse of seat belts in a manufacturers' products liability claim based on a defective seatbelt restraint system in Oklahoma. The applicable statute, 47 0.$.1991 § 12-420, 2 provides that "the use or nonuse of seat belts shall not be submitted into evidence in any civil suit in Oklahoma." The question is answered as follows: although the Act prevents a person from being penalized in a civil proceeding for choosing not to…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Kirkland v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
- Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. v. Glyn-JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Fields v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- Tina BARRON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY OF CANADA LIMITED, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Clyde W. HINDS and Mary Lee Hinds, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Sims v. Great American Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Stokes v. Montana Thirteenth Judicial District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 2011
- Allenberg v. Bentley Hedges Travel Serv. Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- BEYRER v. THE MULESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2021
- Clark v. Mazda Motor Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.