Legal Opinion

Bishop v. Takata Corp.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 26, 2000No. 94,751PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 KAUGER, J.;

11 2 We are asked to answer the question of whether the Oklahoma Mandatory Seat Belt Use Act, 1 [the Act] precludes the introduction of evidence of the use or nonuse of seat belts in a manufacturers' products liability claim based on a defective seatbelt restraint system in Oklahoma. The applicable statute, 47 0.$.1991 § 12-420, 2 provides that "the use or nonuse of seat belts shall not be submitted into evidence in any civil suit in Oklahoma." The question is answered as follows: although the Act prevents a person from being penalized in a civil proceeding for choosing not to…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Kirkland v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
  2. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. v. Glyn-JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Fields v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  4. Tina BARRON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY OF CANADA LIMITED, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  5. Clyde W. HINDS and Mary Lee Hinds, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Sims v. Great American Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  2. Stokes v. Montana Thirteenth Judicial District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Allenberg v. Bentley Hedges Travel Serv. Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  4. BEYRER v. THE MULESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2021
  5. Clark v. Mazda Motor Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API