Legal Opinion

Nicholas Straussler v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 7, 1961No. 209-59PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JONES, Chief Judge.

This is a suit for infringement of United States Letters Patent 2,398,057 issued to the plaintiff on April 9, 1946,. and disclosing a propulsion device for amphibious motor-driven vehicles. The plaintiff claims that the defendant has infringed this patent by the manufacture of such military amphibious equipment as the “Otter,” the “Duck,” and the T~ 46E-1 cargo carrier. The defendant has not answered the complaint, but under Rule 51(b), 28 U.S.C.A., has moved for summary judgment on the grounds that the plaintiff is barred from asserting infringement under the doctrine of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Ethyl Gasoline Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Schriber-Schroth Co. v. Cleveland Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Altoona Publix Theatres, Inc. v. American Tri-Ergon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Marcus Haliczer, D/B/A Noveltex Products Co. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
  2. Straussler v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
  3. Misani v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  4. United States Pipe & Foundry Co. v. James B. Clow & Sons, Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1962
  5. Arthur J. Schmitt Foundation v. Stockham Valves & Fittings, Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API