Legal Opinion
Misani v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided June 1, 1965PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Per curiam
The trial court dismissed the plaintiff’s action as against some of the defendants and the jury returned a general verdict in favor of the remaining defendants. On appeal, the Appellate Division ordered a new trial as to the defendants Ortho, Oroshnik and Johnson & Johnson. See 83 N. J. Super. 1 (1964). Thereafter, we granted cross-petitions for certification. 43 N. J. 264 (1964).
The plaintiff was employed by Ortho in January 1955 after she had responded to an advertisement seeking an organic chemist to perform “research in synthetic medicinal chemistry” of ccbasic character.” Shortly…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Motion Picture Patents Co. v. Universal Film Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- General Electric Co. v. Wabash Appliance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Mahn v. HarwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. CiavattaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Ji v. PalmerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
- Andreaggi v. RelisNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
- Cartan v. Cruz Construction Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
- First American Title Insurance v. Vision Mortgage Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.