Legal Opinion
United States Pipe & Foundry Co. v. James B. Clow & Sons, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Alabama
Decided February 19, 1962No. Civ. A. 9813PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GROOMS, District Judge.
This cause coming on to be heard on the testimony and exhibits of plaintiff’s and defendant’s witnesses, and on the arguments and briefs of plaintiff’s and defendant’s counsel; and the Court, being fully advised, enters the following findings of fact and conclusions of law:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. This is a suit brought under the Patent Laws óf the United States by the plaintiff, United States Pipe and Foundry Company, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of New Jersey, having its principal place of business in Birmingham, Alabama, against the defendant, James…
2Cases cited85 opinions
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Seymour v. OsborneSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ling-Temco-Vought, Inc. v. Kollsman Instrument CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Rohm and Haas Co. v. Dawson Chemical Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1983
- James B. Clow & Sons, Inc. v. United States Pipe and Foundry CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- Smith Industries International v. Hughes Tool CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Arthur J. Schmitt Foundation v. Stockham Valves & Fittings, Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1966
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.