Stanek v. Kenai Peninsula Borough
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATTHEWS, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
An ordinance of the Kenai Peninsula Borough excludes from taxation $10,000 of the value of residential property used as the owner's permanent residence. An Anchorage resident who owns a second home in the Borough challenges the ordinance, contending mainly that it illegally discriminates against Borough nonresidents. We uphold the ordinance because it discriminates on the basis of property use, treating resident and nonresident owners of second homes alike, and because this discrimination is legitimate.
II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
Ronald Stanek owns a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Alaska Pacific Assurance Co. v. BrownAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
- Animal Rescue League v. Assessors of BourneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- State, Department of Revenue, Permanent Fund Dividend Division v. CosioAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
- Sweet v. Sisters of Providence in WashingtonAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Alaska Civil Liberties Union v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
- Planned Parenthood of the Great Northwest v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
- Griswold v. City of HomerAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
- Public Employees Retirement System v. GallantAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Alaska Inter-Tribal Council v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.