Legal Opinion

Public Employees Retirement System v. Gallant

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 2007No. S-11926, S-11945PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTHEWS, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

By statute, two Alaska retirement systems pay retirees who reside in the state a cost-of-living allowance that adds ten percent to their basic retirement pay. The question presented is whether failing to pay a similar allowance to retirees who live in high cost areas outside Alaska violates the equal protection clause of the Alaska Constitution. We hold that it does not because the purpose of the allowance-encouraging retirees to continue to live in Alaska by partially offsetting Alaska's higher cost of living-is legitimate and it bears a fair and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Memorial Hospital v. Maricopa CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Zobel v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Attorney General of New York v. Soto-LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Alaska Pacific Assurance Co. v. BrownAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. OstroskyAlaska Supreme Court · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Gefre v. Davis Wright Tremaine, LLPAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. Planned Parenthood of the Great NorthwestAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Planned Parenthood of the Great Northwest v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Dennis O. v. Stephanie O.Alaska Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Griswold v. City of HomerAlaska Supreme Court · 2011

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API