Legal Opinion
Kyne v. Kyne
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 28, 1943No. Civ. 12351PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHOTTKY, J. pro tem.
This is an appeal from an order denying appellant’s application for further attorneys’ fees and costs. In order to understand properly the issues involved upon this appeal it is necessary to review briefly the history of this litigation.
In November, 1935, plaintiff, Tom Kyne, Jr., brought this action against defendant and respondent Tom Kyne, to establish his paternity and obtain support, costs and counsel fees under section 196a of the Civil Code. Before trial, in August, 1936, plaintiff, through his guardian, employed Allen Spivock to act as his attorney under a written…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Arais v. KalensnikoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Burke v. MaguireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Lynde v. LyndeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1902
- Newman v. FreitasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Kyne v. KyneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Pasadena Medi-Center Associates v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Martino v. Concord Community Hospital DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- In Re Marriage of ShoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Zak v. State Farm Mutual Liability InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Healy v. BrewsterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.