Legal Opinion

Sharp v. Bowen

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 10, 1935No. 5546PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EVANS, District Judge.

This action was commenced for the purpose of determing the right to the use of an irrigating ditch extending through appellants’ premises and claimed to have been used for the irrigation of lands owned by respondent. The amended complaint, in substance, alleges that for many years prior to 1920, John G. and Eliza S. Sharp were the owners of a tract of land, a portion of which was subsequently sold to the respondent, and at a later date another portion was ac quired by appellants; that, at the time of the conveyance of the premises to respondent and for a long time prior…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. De Molera v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. American Type Founders' Co. v. PackerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Bell v. StaackeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Christensen v. Ogden State BankUtah Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Drathman v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lappinen v. Union Ore Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  2. Denver & R. G. W. R. Co. v. Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Townsend v. HolbrookUtah Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API