Legal Opinion

Christensen v. Ogden State Bank

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 13, 1930No. 4858PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtElias Hansen, J.

This is a controversy over a savings deposit account in the Ogden State Bank. Plaintiff claims that the account belongs to him. The interveners, Ogden State Bank as executor of the will of Jens Christensen, deceased, and Eliza M. Christensen, the surviving widow and a legatee of the deceased, claim that the savings deposit account is a part of the estate of Jens Christensen, deceased. Defendant Ogden State Bank in its individual capacity makes no claim to the account except as a depositary. Upon issues joined by the pleadings a trial was had to the court sitting without a jury. The trial…

2Cases cited74 opinions

  1. Beaver v. . BeaverNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Young v. . YoungNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  3. Whalen v. MilhollandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1899
  4. Chippendale v. North Adams Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  5. Cleveland Trust Co. v. ScobieOhio Supreme Court · 1926

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Greener v. GreenerUtah Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Holt v. BaylesUtah Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Badders v. PEOPLES TRUST CO.Indiana Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Helper State Bank v. CrusUtah Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Lovett v. Continental Bank and Trust CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1955

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API