Legal Opinion

Townsend v. Holbrook

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1936No. 5651PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOLLAND, Justice.

This is an action for damages for an alleged conversion of a Buick automobile by the personal defendant, the sheriff of Davis county. The corporate defendant is his official bondsman. The facts, briefly, are these: John C. Burton entered the state driving a Buick automobile. An action was commenced against him by a Utah creditor in the district court of Davis county and writ of attachment issued. The defendant sheriff, pursuant to the writ of attachment, took the car into possession. The California registration certificate showed Burton as the registered owner and the Frank…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Egelund v. FayterUtah Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Piper v. EakleUtah Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Thomas v. Perry Irr. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Bouwhuis v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1926
  5. In Re Application 7600 to Appropriate WaterUtah Supreme Court · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Johnson Et Ux. v. BrinkerhoffUtah Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Coates v. AllenUtah Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API