Legal Opinion

In re Herbert

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 29, 1972No. 8664PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

E,ich, Acting OMef Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming the rejection of claims 11-13 and 15-241 in appellant’s *1092application serial No. 667,611, filed September 13, 1967, which appellant contends is entitled, under 35 USC 120, to the benefit of the October 19,1964, filing date of Ms application serial No. 404,972 of which this is said to be a continuation, and, under 35 USC 119, to the benefit of the October 25, 1963, filing date of his British' application No. 42210/63. W'e affirm.

The Subject Matter Claimed

Claims 11-13 and 15-21 are drawn to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Application of Charles D. Prater and James WeiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
  2. Application of Aubrey A. LarsenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961
  3. Application of William A. SheppardCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
  4. Application of Zoltan TARCZYHORNOCHCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
  5. Application of Wilhelm Neugebauer, Martha Tomanek and Hans BehmenburgCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Diane M. DillonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  2. In re BurckelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
  3. In Re Diane M. DillonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  4. In Re Robert M. HunterCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  5. In re MullinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API