Legal Opinion

In re Burckel

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 1, 1979No. Appeal No. 78-616PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICH, Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Board of Appeals (board) affirming the examiner’s rejection of claims 1-3 and 6 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 in application serial No. 511,-028, filed September 30, 1974, entitled “Product.” We affirm.

The Invention

Appellant’s invention relates to fiber blends, yarns, and fabrics for use in lightweight garments offering protection against brief exposure to “extreme thermal fluxes”- — in lay terms, fire. The fiber blends comprise a mixture of two different types of fibers in staple form, one of which melts in the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In re WrightCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
  2. In re LambertiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
  3. In re SimonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
  4. In re HellsundCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
  5. In re HerbertCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In Re Howard SernakerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  2. In Re Walter Kaslow and Uniform Product Code Council, Inc. (Uppc), IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  3. Shelcore, Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Durham Industries, Inc., Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  4. In Re William J. KingCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
  5. In Re Michael Geisler, Rudolf Kotter-Faulhaber, Susanne Wuerz and Michael JungCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API