Legal Opinion
County of Pine v. State, Department of Natural Resources
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 11, 1979No. 49338, 49406PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROGOSHESKE, Justice.
At issue is the constitutionality of the Kettle River Wild and Scenic Rivers Ordinance (Kettle River ordinance), adopted pursuant to the Minnesota Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, Minn.St. 104.31 to 104.40. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) and its commissioner, defendants, and Ronald Christianson, intervenor, appeal from a judgment permanently enjoining enforcement of the Kettle River ordinance to the extent that its provisions exceed those of the Pine County shorelands ordinance. We hold that intervenors-respondents John and Sharon Scanlan must exhaust available…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Nectow v. City of CambridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Naegele Outdoor Advertising Co. of Minnesota, Inc. v. Village of MinnetonkaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- State Ex Rel. v. HoughtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- McShane v. City of FaribaultSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- In Re HubbardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Graham v. Itasca County Planning CommissionCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- Northern States Power Co. v. City of OakdaleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- Parranto Bros., Inc. v. City of New BrightonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.