Legal Opinion
Northern States Power Co. v. City of Oakdale
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided February 2, 1999No. C3-98-867PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O PINION
HARVEY A. HOLTAN, * Judge.
Northern States Power Company (NSP) appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the City of Oakdale (the city) in a case involving an ordinance requiring underground electric distribution lines. We affirm.
FACTS
In the spring of 1997, Imation Corporation requested that NSP provide additional service to its facility located in the City of Oakdale. NSP subsequently informed the city of its intent to construct new overhead electric distribution lines along state highways 5 and 120. NSP’s General Rules and Regulations (tariff) § 5.1A…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Keystone Bituminous Coal Assn. v. DeBenedictisSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Borough of Roselle v. Public Service Electric & Gas Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. STATE OF MINNESOTA Ex Rel. THE CITY OF DULUTHSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- City of Albuquerque v. New Mexico Public Regulation CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
- City of Allen v. Public Utility Commission, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005
- Northern States Power Co. v. Federal Transit AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- City of Cohasset v. Minnesota PowerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- In Re the Excess Surplus Status of Blue Cross & Blue Shield of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.