Legal Opinion

Reeder v. Hoag

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 26, 1958No. Civ. 17491PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDraper, J.

P1aintiff Edna Reeder drove the automobile of her son, Max, from San Lorenzo, to Oakland. She had some difficulty with the brakes and took the car to the service station of defendant Mazzie to have them repaired. Mazzie examined the brake system, determined that the difficulty was in the master cylinder, and told Mrs. Reeder that he would not have time to repair it but would arrange to have the job done by another. He sent the car to de fendant Hoag, who operated a brake repair shop, at about 3 o’clock p. m. Mazzie told Mrs. Reeder to return for the car at 5 p. m., although he knew the job…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Laurenzi v. VranizanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Jordan v. GuerraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Spruce v. WellmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. Nelson v. BlackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  5. McFate v. ZuckermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Magee v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. Syverson v. HeitmannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. Dodds v. BucknumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Wiley v. EasterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Steele v. HashCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API